![]() ![]() |
|
Nevada NewsMakers Blogs
Term LimitsPublished: 4/18/2008 8:25:48 AMI’ll admit that most voters don’t generally know the intended and unintended consequences of some ballot questions, especially when they are intentionally confusing. The competing smoking ban questions in the 2006 election, or the multiple questions to limit malpractice liability in 2004, were intended to confuse voters. That is a bad way for special interests to change policy in this state, let alone deceptive to the voters. Now it appears that some legislators are playing a similar game of trickery.
Veteran legislators are now saying that the voters didn’t vote for the exact same question twice, and thus the term limits law is not “legal.”
The 1994 ballot question limited terms for all elected officials, including judges. But the Supreme Court stepped in and split the 1996 question into two parts. One covered judges and was rejected by voters. The second part covered all other officials and passed, with about 70% of the vote. Voters voted twice to limit legislators and local officials. Their intention is perfectly clear. Whether it’s legal is in question, but shame on the courts for not correcting this issue by saying that both questions should appear again in 1998. But the intent of the issue is clear. Voters want term limits. To blatantly go against voter intent is not only outrageous, but incredibly self-serving for the noblesse oblige who run our legislature. (Of course, they are getting third parties to do fight the battle so that they don’t look self-serving.)
Voters know the intended consequences of term limits – they don’t want career politicians who become beholden to the special interests. They also knew the unintended consequences – that some long-time leaders, whom they may like, won’t be able to run anymore. But that is a price they are willing to pay so that they can have a little control over the election system.
I’m not surprised at the assault on term limits. Some of these folks just can’t let the power go. I just hope that the voters will revolt at this blatant attempt at job protection and fight off this end run around the constitution and voter intent. I also hope that the court rules that while the Supreme Court messed up by separating the 1994 question into two questions in 1996, voter intent was clear on the issue. We voted twice to limit the term of legislators. If the court doesn’t rule this way, then they should be prepared for another term limits fight – and this time it should include judges! Leave it to a kid from SudanPublished: 4/14/2008 4:31:31 PMAfter reading what John Bul Dau and thousands of other kids went through to get an education in a Sudanese refugee camp - and how they were able to pass their exams each year despite not having pencils and papers, let alone a computer - well, I just don’t have much sympathy for the financial "crisis" our educational leaders desperately want us to believe exists in Washoe County today. Realities of a Recession....Published: 3/28/2008 3:31:37 PMThere may be more budget reductions coming soon to state government, and what do educators say?
According to a Las Vegas Review Journal story, state public schools Chief Keith Rheault said that the next round of cuts could lead to reductions in staffing for athletics or other non-teaching programs.
Now, I like Keith Rheault, but come on, Athletics? Well that is one way to get the parents engaged. Cut athletics instead of oh, say, a few administrators, or a few assistant principals.
He’s taking a page from the teacher’s union handbook and making cuts that will get the public’s attention. They are considering cuts to programs that parents actually help pay for! That’ll tick them off and get them to come out and vote for a ballot question to raise taxes for schools, because they will see that the school boards have cut all that they can, now that they are cutting athletics. Oh please! Come on Mr. Rheault – do the right thing and get rid of the middle management as the private sector does when money gets tight. Early retirement buy outs are good, too.
But doing that won’t get the public’s attention.
But my favorite gripe comes from Mary Jo Parise-Malloy of Nevadans for Quality Education. She is mad at the Governor for further cuts in education, saying “education wasn't supposed to be a part of the cuts last time around either. “
Oh come on. Education is 35% of the state budget. You can’t take it out of the mix. Across the board cuts are the most equitable cuts. Considering that 80% of the state budget goes to salaries, the reality is that real budget cuts mean job losses. Just like in the private sector.
I have three friends who have lost their jobs in the past few months. It sucks, but it happens. I fail to understand how government employees feel that their jobs are above “cutting”.
And for all of you that say, “oh let’s just raise taxes.” That is the last thing the government should do in a recession! We all have to slow our spending, and government is no different. McCain's Lead Gives Me HopePublished: 2/12/2008 8:29:39 PMI’m not a big McCain fan - can’t say I was thrilled with any of the candidates running for President. But McCain’s lead indicates, to me at least, that the Christian right wing, pro-life activist don’t control the Republican Party. It gives me hope that moderates still have a voice in the GOP. And it shows that the silent majority is really us moderates – the folks that the media totally ignores. Let me remind you that the basic core value of the Republican Party is less government in our life. To me, and many others, that means it’s not the role of government to tell you how to run your life - how many kids you should have, or who you should marry. Those are decisions better dictated by your religious beliefs than by your government. This position is more aligned now with the Libertarian Party, but it truly is a Republican position. Sure McCain is not the best fiscal conservative, but if he sticks to his promises of making the Bush tax cuts permanent and will veto spending bills containing earmarks, then I can live with that. I like McCain because he has risen above the negative rhetoric and hate-speak that dominates national politics. He’s reached across the isle to work with “the enemy.” What a novel concept. Now maybe McCain-Feingold-Cochran is not the best bill ever, but at least he was wiling to go where few politicians have in the past and do something to level the playing field in campaigns. Much more needs to be done, but his bill was a start. Our elected leaders should take a clue from McCain and try working with the other party. Voters are fed up with the hate-speak and rhetoric. We want you guys to work together, to get along, and to find common ground. McCain has done that, and we like. Get a clue politicians – stop bashing the other party and start working with them to tackle the tough issues. And for those who say McCain is too liberal, just look at the recent National Journal’s ratings of the Senators. Obama was the most liberal Senator, while Clinton ranks 16th. McCain is looking a little better. Nevada’s Role in Presidential Politics is Not NewPublished: 1/22/2008 1:09:55 PMMany think that the presidential caucus this month is going to put Nevada in the national political spotlight. Well, Nevada has been in the presidential spotlight for decades, though not always in a positive light.
“West Wing” fans remember the last episode of the show as Matt Santos is watching the election results - and as he wins Nevada, he wins the election. Similar to what happened in 2000 when Bush won Nevada, which put him over the top in electoral votes. Our role in national politics was memorialized by NBC, but it’s not the first time our role was revealed.
In a fascinating book on Nevada’s role in national politics, “The Money and the Power” by Sally Denton and Roger Morris, they explain the role Nevada played in the 1960 race - when Jack Kennedy, backed by gaming interests, was running against Nixon, who was backed by Howard Hughes.
Many know the stories of Joe and Jack Kennedy and their time spent the Cal-Neva at Lake Tahoe, and on The Strip. This relationship with gaming turned into a major source of funding for Kennedy.
It was that potential funding that caught Joe Kennedy’s attention in 1958. According to Morris and Denton, Joe Kennedy sent scouts to Nevada to investigate the state and ended up giving money to help Grant Sawyer become Governor - as Kennedy believed the way to gaming was through the Governor. And it did. According the Morris and Denton, JFK received over $15 million from Las Vegas interests – an astronomical amount in 1960.
When Election Day arrived, the odds on The Strip were three-to-two for Kennedy. Morris and Denton recount how Teddy Kennedy called casino boss Ross Miller at the Riviera to place a $10,000 bet on his brother to win. It’s a little ironic that grandson Ross Miller is now the man responsible for fair and honest elections as our Secretary of State. At least betting on elections is illegal now.
Nevada was the only far west state to go for Kennedy, which he won by 1,900 votes. But many questioned the results. Precincts in North Las Vegas turned in way more votes than anyone reasonably expected. Across the nation, election fraud was verified in numerous areas, by both parties, but the new Attorney General, Bobby Kennedy, halted most of the investigations, while corrupt judges around the country took care of the rest. Kennedy won the election by 114,000 votes out of nearly 69 million. (So when you hear people say how George Bush stole the election in 2004, the same could be said of Kennedy, and probably many others.)
Democracy is not a perfect systemPublished: 1/21/2008 8:39:21 AMWhile Democracy is a participatory sport - caucusing requires full body contact.
That’s what made the caucus so fun to me. You could not help but get engaged in the democratic process.
Unlike a primary where you just go vote in an atmosphere of anonymity, the caucus forced you to interact with other voters. People talked with their neighbors about issues and listened respectfully as people shared their beliefs.
As a worker at the Galena High caucus, I went from room to room to provide guidance on the process. I was impressed with the way people were not afraid to share their views and opinions on issues from immigration to the economy. But I was most impressed with the respect and civility that these strangers showed their neighbors.
While I’m torn on whether we should caucus again, or go back to a primary, I’m glad that I participated. I have renewed faith in the voters of Reno. I’m proud of those who expressed their opinion on issues or candidates. I’m pleased with how many of you sought a delegate spot to the convention. But I’m most impressed with the sheer number of people who came out on a beautiful Saturday morning to participate.
Democracy is not a perfect system. Neither is caucusing. But for those that participated, you experienced democracy at the most personal and important level.
Now as we move forward, it is the job of the State and County party to keep you engaged, and I will work to help make that happen!
And on a different note about the caucuses: Why aren’t the Democrats releasing the vote totals for the candidates like the GOP did. They released the delegate count, but are refusing to release the actual votes that each candidate got.
I suspect that in their precinct meetings they only really counted the number of delegates that went for Clinton or Obama, but if they are boasting about the record turnout, why don’t they authenticate it with the actual numbers of people that voted? Seems like a smart idea to me. But then, I’m a Republican. In an attempt to make Nevada relevant, Nevada GOP voters became irrelevantPublished: 1/16/2008 11:02:13 AM“For the first time in 50 years, my husband can’t vote in a Presidential primary. This caucus idea is discriminatory.”
That’s what a friend’s mom said to me recently. Her husband, who’s mind is active, but his body is not, can not physically attend the caucus. He votes absentee in elections, but he isn’t allowed to vote absentee in the caucus – you must attend in person.
That’s when it hit me. She is right. This caucus is discriminatory to our military who are not in town, to anyone on travel or who work on Saturdays, and to those physically unable to attend. That is not a fair and open election.
But what’s worse – it’s not even an election! The presidential vote that the GOP will hold on the 19th is a straw poll only. While we will vote for delegates to the county and state convention, they are not bound to outcome of the straw poll.
So, essentially, Nevada Republicans have no say in this year’s presidential primary.
Now I know that by the time we normally vote in September, the nominee is pretty much determined, so Nevada’s vote is irrelevant, but at least we have a vote!
The original intent of Nevada participating in these caucuses was to get more attention from presidential candidates – but that didn’t work out too well. Most of the candidates have been here at least once, but we’d expect that anyway. We also didn’t get the advertising buys that many caucus supporters had hoped.
Republicans are mad. The process had been confusing. The planning has been chaotic, (like postcards being mailed with wrong information.) And the outcome doesn’t matter.
Huckabee Runs Counter to our ConstitutionPublished: 1/8/2008 11:40:36 AMMike Huckabee is running for President on a religious platform that runs counter to our constitution and to the founding principles of America. He’s not running as a morale leader, he’s running as the morale police.
He’s the worst kind of social conservative – he is advocating public policy positions that are entrenched in his religious beliefs. He not only wants to ban gay marriage and abortion, but ban smoking. Oh, and he opposes gambling and isn’t real big on drinking either. Now I respect his right to have those opinions, I just don’t think he should impose them on the nation as public policy.
These are basic civil rights – and constitutional rights – remember the pursuit of liberty and happiness? You should be free to love whom you want, have a family if you want, and smoke or drink if you want – as long as your actions don’t violate the rights of others. It is not the role of government to infringe on your basic civil liberties.
Believe me - I want our government leaders to be morale. But I don’t want our government leaders to force their morality on us.
And while he may be a social conservative, he is NOT fiscal conservative. As Governor he increased taxes many time, ballooned government spending, and increased regulation. During his time in office in Arkansas he increased sales taxes 37%, 16% increase in motor fuel taxes, and 103% in cigarette taxes, according to the Americans for Tax Reform. Under Gov. Huckabee, state spending increased a whopping 65.3% from 1996 to 2004, three times the rate of inflation.
Our founding fathers left England for just that reason. The Church of England was the government. A group of rebels left that rule and came to America to establish a country with a constitutional principle that says that government can not dictate what religion you want to practice. That is the freedom of religion doctrine.
The separation of church and state doctrine means that government and religion should be separate and not interfere in each other's affairs. Huckebee is violating that basic constitutional provision.
But separation of church and state does NOT mean separation of church FROM state. We are one country under God. Our founding fathers supported us being religious, but they were adamant that we not be forced to be religious, nor that our elected leaders impose their religion on us.
It's not Global Warming, It's ArsonPublished: 11/7/2007 1:47:38 PMI can’t believe all these politicians that are getting media attention as they try to blame Bush or Iraq or Global Warming for the fires raging in Southern California.
There is only one reason for the fires – ARSON.... Or should I say arsonists. There are apparently several sick people out there who started fires.
Now, no, not ALL of the fires were started by arson, but frankly, that’s not important right now anyway. Eventually it will be. And looking at how the environmentalists have refused to let forest managers conduct controlled burns is a good place to start…but not yet.
Instead of trying to gain headlines by looking for the cause of the fire, it sure would be nice if those whiney California Liberals would instead look for the money and resources that are needed to get the fires out and the people back on their feet.
I seriously doubt the families who just lost all their positions give a damn about what caused the fires. If I was one of them, I’d sure as hell be mad at folks like the Lt. Gov of California, or Pelosi or Feinstein who used my misery to make political headlines. They were really thinking of their constituents.
And PLEASE stop with all the comparison talk of how the government responded to these fires versus Katrina and Rita. There is no comparison, because these areas of the country are worlds apart. Let’s just start with the simple fact that this part of California is economically more affluent. These people are not dependent on government subsidizes as a majority of the people affected by Katrina were – especially those in the 9th Ward. Many of these Southern Californians are more self-reliant and fiscally responsible. They look to themselves first to get back on their feet. They’ll reach out to family, friends, and neighbors before even pursuing support from agencies like the Red Cross, let alone government. Sure, they will deal with local government for help with “paperwork,” but they won’t be looking for a hand out, or expecting FEMA to put them in a trailer while they rebuild. The role of the Federal government is not as prominent here, because it is not a prominent part of their lives.
Now I know this is a generalization about the populations of these two parts of our county. But we as a nation have got to understand that personal responsibility is the key to re-building our life. Looking to government is not the answer. But after Katrina, it seems that the media and the liberal whiners now expect the government to jump in and take over after a disaster.
As a Republic, we need to get back to the idea that the best government is that which governs least. The most effective, responsible and responsive government is the government closest to the people. And the foundation of a sound Republic is personal responsibility.
If you doubt this, let’s see where Southern California is in two years after this disaster. Let’s hope they are further along than Louisiana is now. What is Brewing for 2008 and 2009 - Hide Your Wallets!Published: 10/5/2007 12:52:26 PMExpect to see Tax Increases and Tax Caps on the Ballot Next Fall The 2007 legislative session can really be labeled "Much Ado About Nothing." Before the session started in February, Legislators were told to expect a surplus of $500 to $800 million. By May that figures was down to under $100 million. The Democrats were pushing for full day kindergarten in every school, but in the end it was only expanded to 63 schools. The Governor wanted "empowerment" for all elementary schools across the state, but funding was granted for only 30 schools. A $5 Billion backlog loomed for road construction, but in the end less than $1 Billion was allocated from existing revenues. With so many hopes dashed for funding increases, the 2007 session has really done just one thing: forced everyone to revamp their plan for how to get more money in the next election and the next session. So that means the 2008 election is shaping up to be a battle for tax increase, and it’s a three-way war: Teachers vs. Gaming vs. Business. Already we hear that the teachers are threatening a ballot initiative to increase gaming taxes to go toward education – that is why you’re seeing ads by gaming saying how they are already pay 50% of the education budget. Expect to see ads, sponsored by gaming, saying how the business community should be paying more to build roads (since a chunk of change was allocated to road construction from the room tax in Vegas - room tax money that normally goes to the Convention Authority.) In Washoe County, school board officials are putting together a tax package for the 2008 ballot that is likely to increase fees on developers and taxes on real estate. The question on eminent domain that was on the ballot in 2006 will be on again, even though the legislature did pass a measure dealing with the issue this year. The legislative action should make the ballot question moot, but since they both are amending the constitution, both have more hoops to jump through before either becomes law. We also hear that The Sands Corp. is considering underwriting the cost of a ballot initiative for 2008 to take "new" room tax revenues and put it into building roads, expanding on the room tax funds that were diverted from the Convention Authority this past session. With so many new high-end rooms opening or planned, expansions at The Venetian and Wynn and new construction with Echelon Place and MGM Mirage's CityCenter, some estimate "new" room taxes might raise as much as $200 million a year for transportation needs. To make this more "saleable," they may toss some of the money at education. Meanwhile, there are individuals with their own agenda. University Chancellor Jim Rogers is personally paying for a study to determine the feasibility (and potential acceptance) of personal income tax. This action would require amending the constitution, and for decades Nevadans have said "no way" to an income tax. Former Assemblywoman Sharron Angle is still on the path for a Prop 13 style tax relief for homeowners, but the AFL-CIO and Teachers Union filed a law suit against her petition and it has been stopped,for now. Angle claims that the property tax cap that was passed in 2005 is unconstitutional since it set a different cap for residential (3%) and commercial (8%) property. We are now feeling the economic impact of past ballot questions that raised the minimum wage and banned smoking in stores and restaurants, so we are very concerned with what may happen in 2008 on these questions that will likely raise taxes and fees. Battle lines are being drawn and money is being raised to support or oppose these questions. The bottom line is that your bottom line is threatened. Hold tight to your wallet, and make sure your voice is heard at the ballot box! If not, it could cost you dearly. 2007 Was NOT a Business-Friendly SessionPublished: 6/26/2007 3:13:44 PM2007 Was Not a Business-Friendly Session On the surface this legislative session looked fairly business-friendly. No taxes were increased, the pay roll tax did not go up .02% as required under the 2005 bill, and money was allocated for highway construction.
But if you knew what was happening behind the scenes, you’d soon learn that the Legislature, especially the Assembly, is growing more and more anti business.
Legislators were a bit spoiled last session when they had about $800 million of “surplus” taxpayer money to play with. After they returned $300 million to drivers, they still doled out money to numerous projects and organizations that normally would not get money from the legislature. What a trend that started! Many of those organizations were back again, asking for even more money. But when the Economic Forum in May said that a surplus just wasn’t gonna happen, let alone cuts should be made in the Governor’s request, reality should have hit hard. But it didn’t.
Barbara Buckley continued her push for full day kindergarten with a $100 million price tag. Shelia Leslie still wanted $20 million for the homeless. Dina Titus wanted $60 million for teacher incentive. They wanted the money despite the reality that there wasn’t any to spare. So what was their answer? Raise taxes.
At one point Buckley was pushing a tax increase of close to $2 billion to cover roads and schools
But it wasn’t state programs that were the only problem. Private sector organizations like The Cancer Institute wanted $10 million, Truckee Flood Control wanted $20 million, $1 million for Chronic Fatigue… the list goes on and on. With little surplus available, the fight over the scraps intensified.
The real kicker was the one no legislator wanted to touch – a $5 billion shortfall in transportation with a pledge of no new taxes from the Governor! This legislature was looking for money every day, and they were looking for it in ways that could circumvent the Governor’s pledge. They’d passed bills out of committee that added on a fee, only to have the fee stricken later. So when that didn’t work, they tried the unusual tactic of “letting the VOTERS decide”. That’s a surefire way to kill a new levy—the voters won’t support it. Then they want to put a question on the ballot to see if voters want to raise money for school construction. They tried another one for roads, but that bill died.
When they weren’t trying to raise taxes and fees, they were reducing existing tax breaks. We all know how they changed the “green tax” to reduce the property tax abatement. They also killed any bills that would have reduced payroll tax, even if it encouraged health insurance, or property tax abatements for education. They also refused to roll back the bank franchise fee or adjust the higher payroll rate, which many believe are unconstitutional, let alone totally unfair.
Beyond the money issues, the Democrat leaders in the Assembly tried time and again to put more rules and regulations on businesses. From trying to manage Pay Day loans out of business, to forcing stores to report every shipment of allergy pills, business lobbyists spent more time killing bad bills that limited competition, then pushing ones that encouraged free enterprise. This anti-business sentiment is only getting stronger, and it will continue as long as the Assembly remains in Democrat (and union) hands.
The business community has got to come together and find qualified business people to run for the Assembly. With term limits, there will be 10 Democratic Assembly seats opening up in 2010 (while only 2 Republican seats are open in solid GOP districts.) If you’re a boss, you need to look ay your employees and see if there is someone you can spare for a few months. Otherwise, we’ll continue to have an Assembly run by government workers!
But Business also has to come together on the transportation issue. Business in general was united in its opposition to increasing the weight distance fee or the diesel tax, as its cost would hurt commerce and consumers. Gaming opposed the reallocation of their room tax. And no one would touch a gas tax increase – the most logical source. The Governor’s plan is a temporary fix until business and gaming can come together. And they had better do so by 2009, or the tax fight of 2003 will look like a schoolyard brawl compared to the championship smackdown that will be 2009. I don’t want ringside seats for that fight!
Democrats Show True Color - YellowPublished: 5/12/2007 12:21:57 PMLast week an “emergency” bill came out of the Democrat-controlled Assembly to overturn the “green” tax. This was a 50% reduction on property taxes for companies that spent more in the construction of their building to comply with strict national environmental standards. The Dems created this bill in 2005, but they failed to look at the full consequences of it – which is nothing new.
The idea was to encourage companies to be more “green.” But when education leaders cried “poor” this year due to the enactment of the 2005 property tax cap (that Democrats Titus and Perkins pushed to help their failed runs for Governor) and this “green” tax abatement, the Assembly Democrats saw red and turned yellow.
They chickened out. They caved to the teachers union. They chose education over the environment. They chose taxpayer funded day care (full day kindergarten) over clean air.
Now this isn’t a shock. We know they are the party of the teachers union. But to consider this an emergency and go back on their word is bad policy. They are once again reacting too quickly to something they created. They failed once again to look at the unintended consequences of their actions.
Luckily the Governor is being more responsible and looking at the legal ramifications of removing this tax abatement. And he’s not buying the teacher’s union cry for more money. Until educators and Democrats realize that our education system is failed (over 30% drop out rate) they will continue to face a fight from the rest of us who don’t want to throw money at a failed system.
Illegal Immigrants Want Path to CitizenshipPublished: 5/2/2007 1:45:47 PMI read about the rallies across the country on May 1st, May Day.
May Day...the day generally reserved for communists and socialists to rally for the labor movement...is now a day of protest for illegal immigrants who want a path citizenship.
Mother’s were telling reporters how we shouldn’t deport their families. Of course, they didn’t dare tell the reporters how they came here illegally to birth their children so they can take full advantage of our health and educational system - at no cost to them.
I’m sorry. I know the illegals are key to our service and construction industry. I understand how we are taking advantage of them for jobs no legal citizens will take. But I’m losing empathy, and I’m losing respect for their fight because of their attitude.
You want a path to citizenship, follow the rules all the legal citizens followed. You want a path to citizenship, learn English. You want a path to citizenship, stop cheating the system with fake social security numbers, and stop using the emergency room as your primary care physician.
If not, you want a path to citizenship - just follow the Rio Grande. Teacher's Union Newest StoogePublished: 4/30/2007 4:42:26 PMRookie Democrat Ruben Kihuen is the latest legislator to fall into the hands of the teachers union. He is pushing a bill that allows a teacher to continue to teach for up to 90 days after their teaching license lapses.
I watched him on Headline News Legislative Update and I just couldn’t believe his rationale for this bill.
I’ll paraphrase some of the highlights:
If a teacher fails to pass the test for his license, he should not have to stop teaching and be pulled from the classroom where the kids just love him.
If the teacher loses his license because he is too busy mentoring a student or can’t get fulfill his 6 hours of continuing education, he should not be pulled from the classroom, cause it’s just not fair to the students who love him.
There is such a shortage of teachers, so kicking them out of the classroom for not having a license is only making the shortage worse, and the kids will suffer.
He had several more reasons; most of them just as inane, and most of which ended with… it’s just not fair to the kids who love their teacher…
Right now the school district can immediately suspend a teacher without pay if their license lapses - as it should be! Maintaining your license is one of the most important criteria for a teacher.
And goodness knows how having one of those licenses keep so many potential good teachers OUT of the classroom.
Hey, teachers union, I’ll make you a deal. If you’re gonna give such slack to a just-out-of-college teacher who can’t pass his license test, then why not allow, say, a retired CPA to teach accounting for 90 days without a license. Or better yet, open up the teaching profession to all retirees that want to teach by allowing them to even TAKE the test. That’s one way to help the shortage.
Once again, the union is doing its job – protecting bad teachers. (And it’s not just me that says that – ALL my teacher friends say that. And yes, I have friends that are teachers.)
All we’re doing is setting low expectations for our teachers, and they are meeting them. It’s not their fault, its ours. (And yes, the union that perpetuates these low expectations.) But that also means that students are meeting those low expectations.
If we really want to improve the education our students receive, we should look at what is being done in the country with the highest performing students – Finland. They’ve been kicking butt since 2000. That’s because they starting requiring that their teachers have a Master’s Degree. They also paid them more and put their profession on par with doctors and lawyers.
We must do the same. But a bill like Kihuen’s is not the right message.
Oh, and I hate to say it, but the bill passed unanimously in the Assembly. So I’m just as crabby with all the Republicans that voted to reward bad behavior.
The Benefits of Term Limits?Published: 4/23/2007 10:34:06 AMI like term limits. With campaign finance laws that allow $10,000 donations, the only way to beat an incumbent in Nevada is to wait until they retire or are forced out by gaming or the unions. (The teachers union spent close to $300 K to take out Senator Sandra Tiffany last election. Was that because she wanted to break up the Clark County School District?) So term limits level the playing field.
So as the 2010 deadline for term limits approaches, I had such high hopes for our legislature. I really thought that they’d take on the tough issues, like a long-term solution on how to pay for growth - like school construction and roads. I hoped that they’d tackle the $5 billion deficit in the State public employee benefits program.
Why wouldn’t they? They didn’t have to worry about ticking people off. They could do what was right, not what was politically acceptable. They could focus on the next generation, not the next election.
I’m so naïve.
This year the Senate Tax committee approved a tax increase on home sales to go for school construction, but ONLY if it is sent to the voters for approval.
There is talk that there will be a tax and fee increase to pay for roads, but it will likely be sent to the voters for approval.
Why do we elect you guys if you’re not gonna make the tough decisions? You have more information than voters ever will, so you know what are the best actions to take. Yet you think WE should make the final decision? This is a Representative Democracy, not a Cover-Your-Butt Democracy. We sent you there to represent us, not ensure your re-election.
Come on folks - deal with the big issues. Make the tough choices. Do what’s right. And if you lose at the ballot, at least you know you did the right thing. Sure beats going to bed at night saying, “Oh, I’m still a Senator…the State’s in the tank, but I’m still a Senator.”
Yeah, I’d be proud.
Police Chief and Political ConsultantPublished: 4/18/2007 11:46:12 AMCrime must not be an issue in Nevada’s second largest city, since the Police Chief has opened not just one but two separate companies.
The announcement last week that Henderson Police Chief (and former Assembly Speaker) Richard Perkins has opened a political consulting firm didn’t seem to upset the people of Henderson who pay the full time salary of the Chief. (He already has a business that holds a patent on a gaming device.) He already flies to Carson almost weekly at taxpayer expense to monitor (lobby) the legislature – and he sure doesn’t wear the required badge of any consistent visitor.
Under state law, full time government workers like Police Chiefs are allowed to operate a separate business, as long as they receive permission from their boss; in this case the Henderson City Manager.
Mr. Perkins says that he won’t do any consulting relating to the City of Henderson, but we really don’t know that, since he refused to release his client list – even to the City Manager.
Does anyone else find this ethically questionable? When I was a Federal employee, I could only sell Mary Kay for outside income. You just can’t do this in the real world.
I just can’t imagine Washoe Sheriff Haley or Police Chief Poehlman even ASKING for permission to open a political consulting firm, let alone having the time to do so.
I’m glad I live in a city where our law enforcement leaders take their job, and crime, seriously. Why Are We So Accommodating?Published: 4/11/2007 7:42:04 PMDo you think that if the German government passed a resolution that German will be the official language of Germany, anyone would notice? Would anyone care? Would anyone even question it?
Kind of a no brainer, huh. You want to live in Germany, speak German. Oh, and you have to pay to learn the language, because they only speak German in their schools. You are choosing to live in Germany, so you better adapt and learn to speak German on your own dime. Pretty simple rule of nature: adapt or die.
So, what’s the problem with English as the official language? If you chose to live in America you better learn English if you want to survive, let alone excel.
So why are we so accommodating to people who choose to move to this country and NOT learn our language? Why are we spending American tax dollars to write forms in other languages?
Liberals keep saying that making English the official language “would deny a vast array of social, economic, political and educational opportunities to citizens and others simply because of their language status,” according to the New York State ESL teacher’s website.
I totally agree -- that the opposite is true. Making them continue to speak Spanish in an English-speaking country keeps them as second class citizens. They are not able to excel economically, socially, or politically.
But maybe the Liberals want it that way. Maybe that is their plan. By keeping immigrants as second class citizens, they are dependent on government. They are dependent on social services. They are DEPENDENT on Democrats. They swell their ranks. Why would the liberals want immigrants to become more affluent, independent and responsible? Why, they’d become Republicans!
So while the Liberals call us Racists, I call them Oppressors.
You want to pursue the American Dream? You gotta learn English.
Taxpayer Liability vs. Parental ResponsibilityPublished: 4/10/2007 1:59:50 PMA Senate committee passed a bill to deny illegal students the right to a taxpayer funded college education. Thank you! That’s a good start. Can we next do a financial test and stop paying for college for families that can afford it? I can’t help but wonder how many boats are out there named “Millennium.”
The Guinn Millennium Scholarship program was a nice idea when we had money from the cigarette settlement fund paying for it. But as those funds have gone down, taxpayer dollars are shoring up the program. So now sending your kid to college is somehow MY responsibility? My dad sure wishes he had that option.
Enough already. College has and always will be a family responsibility. There are numerous federal grants and loans that help the economically challenged. There are academic and athletic scholarships that we already subsidize. So come on legislators. Millions of our tax dollars are already going to the University system – this program is becoming a sneaky way of increasing those funds at taxpayer expense, and that was not the intention.
Along with paying for college, Assembly Democrats want us to also pay for day care, I mean Full Day Kindergarten. Once again, taxpayers are being asked to assume parental responsibility.
The dollars required to fund full day kindergarten are just too high. It will hurt all other primary education programs. Studies show time and again that full day kindergarten does not have a lasting benefit. It is not a wise economic or education investment.
You chose to have kids, you chose to take on the associated responsibilities. That’s your job. But too many are not. And instead of punishing parents for not doing their job, liberals just keep saying, “Oh Government will take over for you. It’s not your fault. We’ll help you out.”
The more government encourages irresponsible behavior, the more there will be.
Waste on our Rails, Part 2Published: 4/5/2007 10:47:56 AMJust one more “fact” to help put some perspective on the sensational story mentioned above.
No doubt you’ve seen the stories of how terrorists are now using chlorine bombs in Iraq now, with devastating results. Well, America is much more vulnerable to that type of attack than a shoulder rocket launcher hitting a nuclear waste cask in downtown Reno – and it’s much more deadly.
If a bomb planted beneath a rail car carrying chlorine gas exploded near a populated area, it would kill or seriously injure 1 in every 5 people within 30 minutes, according to the U.S. Naval Research Lab.
Yet is anyone out protesting the transportation of chlorine? No, it’s not as sexy. And you may not even know how prominent it is.
U.S. railroads transport over 1.7 million carloads of hazardous material and chemicals across the nation every year - everything from chlorine to ammonia.
Chlorine Gas - a singe rail car holds ninety tons of the chemical. The gas is a deadly inhalant, and was even used as a weapon in World War I.
Anhydrous Ammonia - a single tank can hold more than six thousand gallons of the chemical. It can attack the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract.
I lived in DC when a truck carrying chlorine tipped over on the Beltway and spilled chlorine. The police cleared a 2 mile radius. And that was just for a spill. An explosion with drifting gas is much more damaging.
Now I’m not trying to scare you, like the Gazette and Bob Loux tried to do. I just want to let you know that there are other much more serious and plausible threats than the ones alluded to in the Sue Voyle’s story. But mine wouldn’t sell papers.
The More Things Change, the More they Stay the SamePublished: 4/4/2007 1:58:34 PMDemocrats ran on “ethics” last November. They were going to put an end to pork barrel politics that had been running rampant in Congress. Moveon.org energized millions of supporters to elect a new breed of patriots by telling them that this new breed of Democrat politicians would stand up to politics as usual and stop the insanity.
What a shock – it didn’t happen. In fact, it got a lot worse.
The $123 billion emergency spending bill that passed the Senate was to be ONLY for the war. But no, the Dems went to town.
Our own Harry Reid got $20 million for controlling Mormon crickets in Nevada, Idaho and Utah, along with other “emergency situations” like $23 million for geothermal research, $500 million for wildfire suppression and $18 million for drought out West.
Katrina relief was an emergency. Fighting crickets isn’t.
Moveon.org is disgusted with the folks they helped elect and is launching a campaign to asking their members to contact their legislators and remind them of why they won. To remind them of the promise they made to improve the system.
I hope it works, because nothing else is stopping the insanity! The Irresponsible Gazette JournalPublished: 4/3/2007 10:27:32 AMThe headline in the Sunday Reno Gazette Journal was in big dark letters... "Nuclear Waste ON OUR RAILS."
It read like a horror story with an ominous threat: radiation could leak out of one of 4500 casks that will travel through downtown Reno/Sparks and contaminate a mile wide swath. A “blast” in the trench would affect hotels, homes and hospitals. Who came up with that scenario? And a shoulder rocket launcher could destroy a cask. Yea, someone yielding a rocket launcher in downtown Reno wouldn’t be obvious.
This is sensational journalism at its best, featuring Mr. Sensational Himself, Bob Loux. He claims there is little recourse to stop the current route “under study” that goes through downtown. I guess Mr. Loux hasn’t read the Nuclear Waster Policy Act of 1976 that guarantees the Governor of Nevada the right to VETO any route. Minor detail the paper fails to mention.
Plus, the route is "under study," so it’s not final. Why the front page story telling us our downtown is under assault when it’s not? And why is the state seeking $500,000 for a study on how to evacuate the downtown, when the route is not final?
But heck, why bother with facts when you are trying to scare people into action as Mr. Loux lives to do. And the Gazette likes to have fearful headlines because they sell papers.
But In case you missed some of facts that were buried in the story, you’ll see that they just don’t support the scenarios alluded to in the paper, let alone imply nuclear annihilation.
Facts like:
- Each train will only have three casks. Even if attacked, the potential for radiation exposure is not fatal – it is similar to that of an X-ray.
- First responders to an incident would have a 10-20% chance of getting cancer in their lives. (A few trips to the dentist have a similar affect.)
- 2700 casks have been shipped across 1.6 million miles without incident.
- A new line is being proposed in the south (is anyone proposing one to bypass Reno? If not, why not?)
What the story didn’t tell you is that the State can demand new rail lines to be built away from major cities. They also didn’t explain the durability of the casks. The spent fuel rods are encased in glass, placed into sealed steel shafts that are inserted into the cement casks that have a lining of more steel. I watched a video of a truck with a cask crash into a solid wall at 65 MPH
Now I’m not a fan of the Yucca Mountain project, but this sensational journalism makes it impossible for people to talk rationally about it. But scare tactics have been the mantra for the environmentalists who for years have swayed journalists to buy into their emotional opposition.
As a former Federal employee, I have little faith in the Federal Government building any major project like this. (I was the lobbyist for the failed Superconducting Super Collider, another DOE project that Congress, in its wisdom, spent $2 billion on and then killed.)
And in DOE fashion, they continue to mess up the repository. Why Congress hasn’t looked at alternatives like building a power plant that could use the spent waste as a fuel source, is beyond me. (Yes, it’s possible.) Last year Congress finally reversed Jimmy Carter’s decision and now allows the study of reprocessing.
And there is where my faith lies. I have faith in entrepreneurs. I have faith that in about 25 years someone will figure out how to reprocess or re-use this stuff so that if DOE actually does get the project built, it can be used as intended – as a repository. They can retrieve the waste, burn it down, and reduce the half life from 10,000 to 100 years.
I wish the Gazette would do big Sunday stories on the real threats to our State –like the growing bill (over $3 billion now) for health care for retired government employees that is going to be put on taxpayers’ backs if the Legislature continues to ignore it. Or the damage being done to our land and animals from invasive species like cheat grass, tall white top and wild horses.
I know these topics aren’t as electrifying as nuclear devastation, but covering them would be responsible journalism.
Your Tax Dollars at Waste, I Mean WorkPublished: 3/30/2007 10:16:43 AMJust an update from my earlier blog on DC – a few more things that, well, irk me.
The entire American History Museum is closed until next summer for renovations. Now while I find this strange that they couldn’t just close portions so that we could enjoy a few displays, I guess its okay since maybe that means they’ll get the job done quicker and cheaper. And, what the hell, it’s only inconveniencing us, the tax payers.
But what really irked me was when I learned that the congestion and construction around the Supreme Court building is going to continue for a lot longer because the Justices refuse to move out of their offices for the renovation there. They aren’t even in session for several months each year, and yet they aren’t willing to move a few law books? The delay and cost overruns also forced a 24-hour work schedule as well, which really sits well with the dozens of residents that live year round across the street.
So it’s okay to inconvenience the taxpayers, but not the people who live off those taxes. Where is the justice?
I also learned more about the Capitol visitor center debacle.
I was told that the new Visitor Center was going to cost $75 million, and that seemed reasonable, though still ridiculously high for an area originally envisioned as a waiting place for tourists when it rains.
But I was wrong, way wrong… close to 10 times wrong!
The elaborate 3 story building will have sandstone on the walls, pink Tennessee marble on the floors, gray Virginia granite on the facade out front, handrails of cast bronze, wood paneling of rich, dark cherry and ceilings of fine plaster…and will probably will wind up costing about $600 million -- more than double the initial $265 million budget projection from 1999. (I think they are trying to include a product from every state so that every congressman can say how he helped include a piece of his state in this testament to our nation’s Capitol. Oh, just shoot me now!)
The chronic delays have also pushed the opening from 2005 to 2006 to 2007 to 2008.
"A monument to government inefficiency, ineptitude and excessiveness," said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), a longtime critic.
The primary reason for this ornate building dates back to 1998, when a deranged man burst into the Capitol with a revolver and killed a Capitol policeman. One wack-job justifies a half a billion dollar construction project – that makes sense.
What’s really sad, though, is the primary defenders of this boondoggle are the Democrats; the same Democrats that have criticized the Republicans for excessive spending and failure to manage projects. Funny how the media is not making much an issue of this total waste of taxpayer’s dollars. Interesting how egos in Congress can justify this temple to Congress, yet questions a fight to free a country from tyranny.
Of course, this is the same Congress that is exempt from Social Security, which is why they have no reason to fix it for the rest of us. They allow Federal government employees the ability to participate in an additional retirement plan, yet refuse a similar idea that would allow portions of Social Security to be privatized for all Americans.
Lack of Access to our Nation's CapitalPublished: 3/27/2007 4:06:27 PMI’m in Washington DC this week, lost in Hoya hype (sorry Mark Fox) and Iraqi war “pull out” dates. While both warrant media attention, I want to warn any of you potential travelers to our nation’s Capital of something the media isn’t covering – the lack of access to our nation’s Capitol Building and other historic monuments.
I lived here for 9 years in the 80’s and 90’s and remember walking freely back and forth across the “Hill,” in front and back of the Capitol Building. There were few obstacles and pleasant police. You could walk into one of several entrances, go through a manometer, and tour the building at your leisure. Not so today.
The construction fencing for the biggest boondoggle in Congressional history, the $75 million tourist center, is 10 feet high and surrounds the entire south and east corners of the building, which means no family photos on the scenic steps of the Capitol, let alone a nice picture of the building itself. (The postcard industry is booming though.) You can not even walk up the front steps of the building and enjoy the scenic views from the expansive walkways.
The sidewalks are blocked on many streets, forcing you to walk in the street, only to be yelled out by a cop telling you to use the sidewalk on the opposite side of the building you are trying to enter, but you can’t because of the construction.
And forget about driving in front of the White House! Pennsylvania Ave. is blocked off, but it is a nice pedestrian area – something Virginia Street casinos should consider! And the parking at the national monuments is almost non-existent. Plan on taking cabs or the metro!
It was such a majestic town in the 1990’s. It was so fun to leisurely stroll around, enjoying the history. It was so nice to take advantage of what our forefathers built. It is a treasure that we all should explore. It is just such a shame that a dozen bad guys (and all those trying to follow in their footsteps), have taken that away from us.
Sell Me Claritin, or I'll Buy it in CaliforniaPublished: 3/23/2007 2:14:40 PMIt’s bad enough that allergy “season” is now year round, and that the common cold is getting stronger, lasting longer, and is more contagious than ever. Now a legislator wants to make you get a prescription from your doctor so you can stop sneezing!
Assemblyman Bernie Anderson (D-Sparks) is pushing AB 150 that would classify all ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine (cold and allergy pills) products as controlled substances and require a prescription.
The intent of the bill is to limit access to these drugs by local drug makers that make methamphetamine. Now don’t get me wrong, I know meth is bad stuff. And I’m all for cracking down on those bums that are making it and selling it. But requiring that a million honest citizens pay more for health care, more for drugs, and lose time away from work cause we can’t get relief from a stupid head cold, just doesn’t seem to be the best answer.
The reality is that only about 20 -30% of meth is made by these “mom and pop shops. Studies have shown that over 70% of meth comes from Mexico. Maybe better border control can keep out illegal aliens and illegal drugs!
The current Federal law requires pharmacists to keep log books of purchases of these drugs so that DEA and law enforcement can track excessive or questionable purchases. Their access to these log books is fine with me, ‘cause they are only looking at commonly used, over the counter drugs.
What really scares me is that making these bills prescription and then allowing law enforcement access to track these drugs (to see if they are being used to make meth) seems to open the door to law enforcement being able to track any and all the meds we take.
What’s to stop them from seeing that I got Comtrex, Theraflu, anti depressants, birth control, oxycontin, and ambian? That information in the wrong hands can be bad news, as Senator Eagleton could tell you, were he still alive.
And what about a doctor who legally and in good faith prescribes the drugs that are used to make meth – is he now culpable?
What about lost revenue? If Nevada will only sell cold pills by prescription, maybe some of the meth makers will leave the state. But they’ll return to sell the stuff illegally. Ban the pills and l go to California and buy it legally. My local drug store loses out on a legal sale, and Nevada loses out on legal sales taxes.
The potential loss in revenue and sales tax may not be huge, but it will be felt.
This is a scary bill for a lot of reasons, but few are willing to oppose it because it’ll look like they are not jumping on the anti-meth wagon. But it’s the wrong approach. Call your legislator and tell them no on AB150. Let’s find a more reasonable approach.
Give the Guy a Break!Published: 3/21/2007 8:58:06 AMWill Jim Gibbons ever be able to serve as Governor without headline after headline accusing him of wrong-doing?
Criticize the guy for his policies or his budget - that is fair game. But this endless barrage of rumors and innuendos that he forced the firing of the U.S. Attorney (something the U.S. Attorney said time and again is not the truth) or that he assaulted a waitress (also not true) or that he helped a Reno company get a contract (something he is supposed to do) is just insane.
Come on people! We are the ones losing out here. We don’t have a Governor that can focus on his job. We don’t have a Governor that can be present at the Legislature pushing his bills. We don’t have a Governor that we elected, doing what we elected him to do!
Oh, wait, maybe that is intentional? Are the Democrats that mean that they can’t fight him fairly on the issues, so they have to discredit him? Are there Republicans that don’t have access to him like they did his predecessor, so they are working to embarrass him?
Don’t believe everything you read folks. There are greater forces at work here, whose agenda I question. These people are cowards who manipulate the media for their own advancement and agenda.
And as it is the “Ides of March,” I can’t help but look to the words of Caesar, which illustrate how cowards fear death (or this case losing a political fight) more that honorable people do: “Cowards die many times before their deaths. The valiant never taste death but once.”
Jim Gibbons is valiant & honorable. He is an officer and a gentleman. He is our Governor. He deserves the chance to BE our Governor.
Stupid Is as Stupid DoesPublished: 3/20/2007 2:30:23 PMThe Law Enforcement community around Nevada is making seat belts their top priority this session. They want to be able to pull you over if you aren’t wearing your seat belt.
Now if you’re smoking, talking on the phone, or drinking coffee you won’t get pulled over. If you’re looking into your rear view mirror and putting on mascara going 65, you’re not breaking the law. If you’re reading the paper, just keep on driving, ‘cause that’s not illegal. Stupid, but not illegal.
It’s also stupid to NOT wear your seat belt. We all know that. But making it a crime doesn’t mean we’ll stop doing stupid things.
Now I understand the medical communities support for this. Wearing a seat belt cuts down on serious injuries and COULD reduce the high number of people sent to the hospital. It even saves lives.
And while some insurance lobbyists testified that there is the “potential” to reduce insurance rates, I talked to a few of them outside the hearing who said they doubt it would happen. Just look at the 20 states that have passed a seat belt law – have their rates gone down? Don’t think so.
So I just can’t figure out why this is so important to law enforcement.
And aren’t there enough drunk drivers or red-light-runners to keep the cops busy? Should they be protecting us from the bad guys instead of ourselves?
If cops really want to reduce accidents, than start with banning cell phones for drivers under 25. Cell phone use is highest among young drivers.
Motorists who use cell phones while driving are four times as likely to get into injury crash, according to a study of drivers in Perth, Australia, conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
80 percent of crashes involve some form of driver inattention within three seconds of the event.
If their intent is to make us better drivers, reduce the distractions. Call or write your legislator and urge them to oppose this bill. Laws are NOT meant to protect us from ourselves!
Lobbyist ReformPublished: 3/16/2007 9:11:22 PMTaking an ethics course doesn’t make you ethical.
A bill being discussed in the Assembly will place tighter controls on lobbyists, require new legislators and lobbyist to take an ethics course, and burden you with paper – all with the intent of making lobbyist honest and ethical.
While I support the concept, there is still a major problem in making lobbyist comply with these regulations – it’s called self reporting.
Right now the law states that we lobbyist (yes, I am one, I have been for decades in both DC and Carson) are required to have a badge whether we are getting paid or not, to talk to a legislator about a bill. (I was lobbyist #728, so there are a few of us in Carson this session.)
We are also required to fill out reports once a month on how much we spent, what legislators attended, and any gifts or loans we made. If I buy lunch for a legislator at a crowded restaurant, then I’m likely to report it since I had witnesses. But if I had a few legislators over to dinner at my house, I really don’t have to tell anyone. Who would know? I’m policing myself. And the legislators don’t have to tell anyone because they don’t have to submit any reports on who they had dinner with.
So the system is dependent on lobbyists being ethical and forthright and following the rules…or else…
Ah, there’s another rub – or else.
I saw Richard Perkins at the Assembly last month, walking the halls, talking to members, without any type of badge. Rumors were flying that he was lobbying without a badge, but nothing was done. Where’s the accountability?
If we don’t come clean about whom we bought dinner for, who’s coming after us? Few reporters snoop around trying to discover who we are lobbying. There’s no ethics officer who is watching us and keeping us honest. There is the threat of legal action, but I don’t know of a single case where a lobbyist was taken to task. (I may be the first after writing this!) And if no legal action came about after the raucous 2003 session, then I can’t think of a time when it will.
But the real issue is this: Buy a legislator lunch to discuss a bill is not going to get their attention as much as a $10,000 contribution to their campaign. You want to reduce the influence lobbyists have, reduce the amount they can contribute. That is the only way to ensure a level ethical playing field.
| Home Page | Campaign Watch | Archived Shows | Contact Nevada NewsMakers | Podcast Help | | Links and Resources | Media Files | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | The Dining Show | ©2005-2008 Sam Shad Productions, All Rights Reserved. |
|